Marketing Attribution and Customer Segmentation
An analysis framework that distinguishes channel quality and retained customer value from low-quality inexpensive conversions using synthetic campaign data.
Tools: SQL · Python · Excel · Power BI
Overview
Independent marketing analytics project focused on channel comparison, segmentation, retention concepts, and clear separation between rule-based attribution, experiments, and correlation.
Business problem
Which channels and customer segments create valuable, retained customers rather than inexpensive but low-quality conversions?
Analysis and approach
- Define acquisition and retention KPIs
- Compare channels on value, not only CPA
- Segment customers by behavior or value
- Label attribution evidence strength clearly
Skills: Campaign performance · Segmentation · Cohort analysis · Attribution concepts
Evidence and visuals
Evidence placeholder — synthetic channel and cohort visuals pending.
Findings and outcome
- Low CPA does not guarantee valuable retained customers.
- Rule-based attribution should not be described as causal lift.
- Segment-level retention changes the budget conversation.
Outcome: An analysis framework that distinguishes channel quality and retained customer value from low-quality inexpensive conversions using synthetic campaign data.
Recommendations
- 1
Report channel quality with retention or LTV proxies beside CPA.
- 2
Label last-touch and other rule-based models as observational.
- 3
Use experiments when incremental lift decisions are high stakes.
Project details
- Dataset / source
- Synthetic campaign and customer dataset
- Data classification
- Synthetic
- Limitations
- Synthetic data cannot prove real campaign ROI.
- Observational attribution is not causal evidence.